In the past, we have tried to create a model of leadership based on the examination of the behaviors of the people that appear to be successful leaders.
After doing that with several apparently successful leaders, we have endeavored to put together a composite collection of behaviors to copy.
This approach has substantially failed because it has ignored a vital component that could be best described as the "chemistry of leadership. If you want to get a good score in chemistry then you can also take ip chemistry tuition in singapore.
" We must understand and recognize the chemistry of leadership and the relationship between leaders and followers. The catalyst for this relationship is the chemistry of leadership.
Unfortunately, psychometric testing fails to reveal the leadership chemistry factor and as a result, their validity and value should be questioned in depth.
What is this chemistry? Where does it come from? And how do we recognize it? This chemistry is generated by the person in the leadership position.
It seems to be carried like a virus to each follower. The rate it spreads is often astounding. The ingredients appear to be things like enthusiasm, trust, integrity, belief, hope, vision, values, and a high degree of emotional intelligence.
The recognition of the chemistry is relatively simple. The followers are constantly demonstrating their commitment to the person in the leadership position. A short conversation with followers will soon reveal their level of commitment and their appreciation and understanding of the chemistry of leadership.
You may have heard people say that they have worked for a really good boss and that that person had their undying loyalty. This is the effect of the chemistry of leadership. The other telling factor is the amount of discretionary effort that followers are exerting in their normal day-to-day work. Where you have high levels of chemistry you have high levels of discretionary effort.